2004 BMW 120 vs. 2008 Isuzu I-290
To start off, 2008 Isuzu I-290 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW 120 would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Isuzu I-290 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Isuzu I-290 (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2004 BMW 120. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-290 should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 120.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 120 (285 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Isuzu I-290. (258 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2004 BMW 120 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Isuzu I-290.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW 120 | 2008 Isuzu I-290 | |
| Make | BMW | Isuzu |
| Model | 120 | I-290 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.2:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 74 L |
