2004 BMW 316 vs. 1958 Seat 600
To start off, 2004 BMW 316 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 316 (113 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1958 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 1958 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 316 weights approximately 889 kg more than 1958 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 316 (175 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 BMW 316 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 316 | 1958 Seat 600 | |
Make | BMW | Seat |
Model | 316 | 600 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 576 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2010 mm |