2004 BMW 316 vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2004 BMW 316 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 316 weights approximately 760 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 316 (175 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 BMW 316 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 316 | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | BMW | Seat |
Model | 316 | 600 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 767 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 175 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2010 mm |