2004 BMW 316 vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 2004 BMW 316 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2004 BMW 316. (113 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 316.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW 316 | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
| Make | BMW | Caterham |
| Model | 316 | 1700 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1692 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 206 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 36 L |
