2004 BMW 318 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62

To start off, 2004 BMW 318 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 2004 BMW 318. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 318. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 743 kg more than 2004 BMW 318. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 383 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW 318. (200 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW 318. 1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2004 BMW 318 has manual transmission. 2004 BMW 318 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2004 BMW 318 1959 Cadillac 62
Make BMW Cadillac
Model 318 62
Year Released 2004 1959
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 6381 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 148 HP 325 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 200 Nm 583 Nm
Torque RPM 3750 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 101.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 98.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1475 kg 2218 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 5720 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 2040 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2670 mm 3310 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 75 L