2004 BMW 318 vs. 1973 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 2004 BMW 318 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 8,190 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado (223 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2004 BMW 318. (113 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 318. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 935 kg more than 2004 BMW 318. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 BMW 318 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW 318. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 318 | 1973 Cadillac Eldorado | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 318 | Eldorado |
Year Released | 2004 | 1973 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 8190 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 223 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3220 mm |