2004 BMW 320 vs. 1962 Zastava 750

To start off, 2004 BMW 320 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,171 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 320 (168 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1962 Zastava 750. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1962 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 320 weights approximately 865 kg more than 1962 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 320 (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Zastava 750. (46 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Zastava 750.

Compare all specifications:

2004 BMW 320 1962 Zastava 750
Make BMW Zastava
Model 320 750
Year Released 2004 1962
Engine Size 2171 cc 766 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 168 HP 24 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 46 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1470 kg 605 kg
Vehicle Length 4490 mm 3300 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1390 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2010 mm