2004 BMW 320 vs. 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood
To start off, 2004 BMW 320 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood would be higher. At 7,725 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood (375 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 2004 BMW 320. (142 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 320.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood (712 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 382 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW 320. (330 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW 320.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 320 | 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 320 | Fleetwood |
Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 7725 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 375 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 712 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 109.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 103.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 98 L |