2004 BMW 320 vs. 1968 Rover 2000

To start off, 2004 BMW 320 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 320 (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1968 Rover 2000. (142 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1968 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 320 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1968 Rover 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 320 (355 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Rover 2000. (272 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2004 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Rover 2000.

Compare all specifications:

2004 BMW 320 1968 Rover 2000
Make BMW Rover
Model 320 2000
Year Released 2004 1968
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1993 cc 3532 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 148 HP 142 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 355 Nm 272 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2600 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1490 kg 1330 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 4550 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2640 mm