2004 BMW 320 vs. 1996 Zagato Bravo
To start off, 2004 BMW 320 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Zagato Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Zagato Bravo would be higher.
Because 2004 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Zagato Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Zagato Bravo has automatic transmission and 2004 BMW 320 has manual transmission. 2004 BMW 320 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Zagato Bravo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW 320 | 1996 Zagato Bravo | |
| Make | BMW | Zagato |
| Model | 320 | Bravo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
