2004 BMW 320 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 BMW 320 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Celica would be higher. Both 2004 BMW 320 and 2000 Toyota Celica are equipped with a 1,995 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 320 (142 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 120 kg more than 2004 BMW 320.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW 320. (330 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW 320.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 320 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 320 | Celica |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 622 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 87 L |