2004 BMW 320 vs. 2008 Mazda 6

To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW 320 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 320 weights approximately 226 kg more than 2008 Mazda 6.

Because 2004 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 320 (334 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications:

2004 BMW 320 2008 Mazda 6
Make BMW Mazda
Model 320 6
Year Released 2004 2008
Body Type Station Wagon Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 2261 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 0 HP
Torque 334 Nm 207 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84.1 mm 87.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 94 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 17.0:1 10.6:1
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Acceleration 0-100mph 9.2 seconds 9.4 seconds
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1580 kg 1354 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1760 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2680 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 6 L/100km 10.9 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 64 L