2004 BMW 320 vs. 2011 Jeep Compass

To start off, 2011 Jeep Compass is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW 320 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Compass (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2004 BMW 320. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 320.

Because 2004 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Compass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 320 (210 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Jeep Compass. (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2004 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Jeep Compass.

Compare all specifications:

2004 BMW 320 2011 Jeep Compass
Make BMW Jeep
Model 320 Compass
Year Released 2004 2011
Body Type Coupe Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 158 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 191 Nm
Torque RPM 3750 RPM 5000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 4404 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1656 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2634 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 67 L 51 L