2004 BMW 320 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW 320 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 320 (148 HP) has 74 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 2004 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 320 (334 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (190 Nm). This means 2004 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 320 | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 320 | Aveo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 334 Nm | 190 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 46 L |