2004 BMW 320 vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW 320 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (156 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2004 BMW 320. (142 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 320 weights approximately 10 kg more than 2013 Toyota Matrix.
Because 2013 Toyota Matrix is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 320 (330 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 320 | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 320 | Matrix |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.5 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 50 L |