2004 BMW 325 vs. 1952 Buick 40
To start off, 2004 BMW 325 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 325 (189 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 325 should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 140 kg more than 2004 BMW 325.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Buick 40 (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW 325. (245 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1952 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 325 | 1952 Buick 40 | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | 325 | 40 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 4066 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 78.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 104.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3090 mm |