2004 BMW 325 vs. 1968 Jaguar 240
To start off, 2004 BMW 325 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW 325 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 325 (184 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1968 Jaguar 240. (131 HP @ 5550 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 325 should accelerate faster than 1968 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 325 weights approximately 155 kg more than 1968 Jaguar 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 325 (237 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Jaguar 240. (204 Nm). This means 2004 BMW 325 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 325 | 1968 Jaguar 240 | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | 325 | 240 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2490 cc | 2483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 184 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 204 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 76.5 mm |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 12.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 54 L |