2004 BMW 325 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 BMW 325 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW 325 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 325 (184 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 325 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 325 (237 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2004 BMW 325 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 325 | 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 325 | Tracker |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2490 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 184 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 139 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2210 mm |