2004 BMW 325 vs. 2002 Mazda 2
To start off, 2004 BMW 325 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW 325 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 325 (189 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 2. (73 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 325 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 325 weights approximately 585 kg more than 2002 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 325 (237 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 2. (111 Nm). This means 2004 BMW 325 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 325 | 2002 Mazda 2 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 325 | 2 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 111 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 71.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 76.5 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 8.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 61 L |