2004 BMW 325 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Evanda
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Evanda is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW 325 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW 325 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 325 (189 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Evanda. (119 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 325 should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Evanda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 325 weights approximately 213 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet Evanda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 325 (237 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Evanda. (176 Nm). This means 2004 BMW 325 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Evanda.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 325 | 2006 Chevrolet Evanda | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 325 | Evanda |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 176 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1497 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 65 L |