2004 BMW 325 vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW 325 would be higher. At 2,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW 325 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 325 (184 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 5. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 325 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 5 weights approximately 19 kg more than 2004 BMW 325.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 5 (310 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW 325. (237 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 325 | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 325 | 5 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2490 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 184 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 310 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 16.7:1 |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1614 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |