2004 BMW 325 vs. 2010 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2010 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW 325 would be higher. At 2,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW 325 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2004 BMW 325. (184 HP @ 7250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 325. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 325 weights approximately 205 kg more than 2010 Mazda RX-8.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 325 (237 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda RX-8. (215 Nm). This means 2004 BMW 325 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 325 | 2010 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 325 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2490 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 184 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 215 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1341 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 64 L |