2004 BMW 325 vs. 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE
To start off, 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW 325 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE (279 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2004 BMW 325. (184 HP @ 7250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 325. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE weights approximately 219 kg more than 2004 BMW 325. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE (353 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW 325. (237 Nm). This means 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW 325 | 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE | |
| Make | BMW | Chrysler |
| Model | 325 | 200 CONVERTIBLE |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2490 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 184 HP | 279 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 83 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1814 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4947 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2089 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2765 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 11 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 64 L |
