2004 BMW 325 vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW 325 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (301 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 2004 BMW 325. (184 HP @ 7250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 325. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 325 weights approximately 4 kg more than 2013 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Mustang (380 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW 325. (237 Nm). This means 2013 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 325 | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 325 | Mustang |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2490 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 184 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1591 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1412 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 11.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 61 L |