2004 BMW 330 vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW 330. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW 330 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2004 BMW 330. (225 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 330. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 390 kg more than 2004 BMW 330. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XJ (450 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW 330. (300 Nm). This means 2013 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW 330.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 330 | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | 330 | XJ |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 450 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2105 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3157 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.9 L/100km | 11.7 L/100km |