2004 BMW 520 vs. 1982 Fiat Panda
To start off, 2004 BMW 520 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Panda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Panda would be higher. At 2,171 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW 520 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 520 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Panda. (44 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 520 weights approximately 975 kg more than 1982 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 BMW 520 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW 520. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Panda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 520 (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Panda. (66 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 BMW 520 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Panda.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 520 | 1982 Fiat Panda | |
Make | BMW | Fiat |
Model | 520 | Panda |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2171 cc | 903 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 66 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2170 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 35 L |