2004 BMW 520 vs. 1990 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 BMW 520 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,171 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW 520 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 520 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1990 Renault Clio. (62 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 1990 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 520 weights approximately 765 kg more than 1990 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 BMW 520 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW 520. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 520 (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Renault Clio. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2004 BMW 520 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 520 | 1990 Renault Clio | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | 520 | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 1990 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 2171 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 23.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |