2004 BMW 525 vs. 1958 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2004 BMW 525 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 525 (193 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac Sixty. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 525 should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 579 kg more than 2004 BMW 525.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW 525 | 1958 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 525 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2494 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 2235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3390 mm |
