2004 BMW 525 vs. 1964 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2004 BMW 525 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2004 BMW 525. (174 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 525. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 386 kg more than 2004 BMW 525. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 525 | 1964 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 525 | DeVille |
Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 2046 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 79 L |