2004 BMW 525 vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW 525. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW 525 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW 525 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 855 kg more than 2004 BMW 525.
Because 2004 BMW 525 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW 525. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Livina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 525 (237 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Livina. (153 Nm). This means 2004 BMW 525 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Livina.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 525 | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | 525 | Livina |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 184 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 237 Nm | 153 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 2405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 52 L |