2004 BMW 525 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW 525. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW 525 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 525 weights approximately 292 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 BMW 525. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 525 (390 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2004 BMW 525 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 525 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | BMW | Mini |
Model | 525 | Countryman |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 390 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1458 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.6 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.7 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 47 L |