2004 BMW 530 vs. 2008 Koenigsegg CCX
To start off, 2008 Koenigsegg CCX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW 530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW 530 would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Koenigsegg CCX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Koenigsegg CCX (806 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 578 more horse power than 2004 BMW 530. (228 HP @ 7250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Koenigsegg CCX should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 530. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 530 weights approximately 390 kg more than 2008 Koenigsegg CCX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Koenigsegg CCX (919 Nm) has 629 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW 530. (290 Nm). This means 2008 Koenigsegg CCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW 530.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 530 | 2008 Koenigsegg CCX | |
Make | BMW | Koenigsegg |
Model | 530 | CCX |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2924 cc | 4719 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 806 HP |
Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 919 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 17 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 18 L/100km |