2004 BMW 530 vs. 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser
To start off, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW 530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW 530 would be higher. At 2,991 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW 530 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 530 (215 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (178 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 530 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Because 2004 BMW 530 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW 530. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 530 (500 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (210 Nm). This means 2004 BMW 530 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW 530 | 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | |
| Make | BMW | Chrysler |
| Model | 530 | PT Dream Cruiser |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2991 cc | 2397 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 178 HP |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 101 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2000 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 6.4 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
