2004 BMW 530 vs. 2012 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2012 Dodge Ram is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW 530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW 530 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Ram (390 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 2004 BMW 530. (228 HP @ 7250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 530. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Ram weights approximately 776 kg more than 2004 BMW 530. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Dodge Ram (551 Nm) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW 530. (290 Nm). This means 2012 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW 530.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 530 | 2012 Dodge Ram | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | 530 | Ram |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2924 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 551 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 2346 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5817 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3569 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 98 L |