2004 BMW 535 vs. 1962 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2004 BMW 535 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 535 (268 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 535 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 310 kg more than 2004 BMW 535.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW 535. (560 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW 535.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 535 | 1962 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 535 | 62 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3430 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 582 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 2140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 75 L |