2004 BMW 535 vs. 2001 Daewoo Vada
To start off, 2004 BMW 535 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Vada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Vada would be higher. At 3,430 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW 535 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 535 (268 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 535 should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Vada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 535 weights approximately 517 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Vada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 BMW 535 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW 535. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Vada, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 535 (560 Nm) has 416 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 2004 BMW 535 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 535 | 2001 Daewoo Vada | |
Make | BMW | Daewoo |
Model | 535 | Vada |
Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3430 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 144 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1313 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2530 mm |