2004 BMW 535 vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW 535. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW 535 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (317 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2004 BMW 535. (268 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 535. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 535 weights approximately 260 kg more than 2013 Cadillac ATS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 535 (560 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac ATS. (373 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2004 BMW 535 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac ATS.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 535 | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 535 | ATS |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3430 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.5:1 | 11.5 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.9 seconds | 6 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.5 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.1 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 61 L |