2004 BMW 630 vs. 2001 Cadillac LMP
To start off, 2004 BMW 630 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Cadillac LMP. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Cadillac LMP would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac LMP is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac LMP (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2004 BMW 630. (254 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac LMP should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 630.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac LMP (401 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW 630. (305 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac LMP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW 630. 2001 Cadillac LMP has automatic transmission and 2004 BMW 630 has manual transmission. 2004 BMW 630 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Cadillac LMP will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 630 | 2001 Cadillac LMP | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 630 | LMP |
Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 254 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 401 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 1 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3090 mm |