2004 BMW 645 vs. 1955 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2004 BMW 645 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 645 (322 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1955 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 645 should accelerate faster than 1955 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 285 kg more than 2004 BMW 645.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW 645 | 1955 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 645 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 5424 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 267 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3290 mm |
