2004 BMW 645 vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2004 BMW 645 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 645 (328 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 645 should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 270 kg more than 2004 BMW 645.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW 645 | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 645 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 2085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3300 mm |
