2004 BMW 645 vs. 1959 Seat 600
To start off, 2004 BMW 645 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 645 (328 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 309 more horse power than 1959 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 645 should accelerate faster than 1959 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 645 weights approximately 1115 kg more than 1959 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 645 (450 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 410 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 BMW 645 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 645 | 1959 Seat 600 | |
Make | BMW | Seat |
Model | 645 | 600 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2010 mm |