2004 BMW 645 vs. 1962 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2004 BMW 645 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 BMW 645 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 645 (322 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 306 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 645 should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 645 weights approximately 1335 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 645 (447 Nm) has 425 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm). This means 2004 BMW 645 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW 645 | 1962 Mazda R 360 | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | 645 | R 360 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 355 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 16 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 447 Nm | 22 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 60 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 63 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 2990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 1770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |
