2004 BMW 645 vs. 1969 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2004 BMW 645 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 BMW 645 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 645 (322 HP) has 269 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 645 should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 645 weights approximately 735 kg more than 1969 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 645 (447 Nm) has 354 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm). This means 2004 BMW 645 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 645 | 1969 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | 645 | 1500 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 93 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2430 mm |