2004 BMW 645 vs. 1972 Rover 2000
To start off, 2004 BMW 645 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 BMW 645 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 645 (322 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1972 Rover 2000. (106 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 645 should accelerate faster than 1972 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 645 weights approximately 420 kg more than 1972 Rover 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 645 (447 Nm) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Rover 2000. (172 Nm). This means 2004 BMW 645 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 645 | 1972 Rover 2000 | |
Make | BMW | Rover |
Model | 645 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 172 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2640 mm |