2004 BMW 645 vs. 1993 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 2004 BMW 645 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 BMW 645 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (542 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 2004 BMW 645. (328 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 645.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (642 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW 645. (451 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW 645.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW 645 | 1993 Jaguar XJ220 | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | 645 | XJ220 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1993 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 3498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 542 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 451 Nm | 642 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 349 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 340 mm |
