2004 BMW 645 vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 2004 BMW 645 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 BMW 645 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 645 weights approximately 71 kg more than 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora.
Because 2004 BMW 645 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW 645. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 645 | 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
Model | 645 | Aurora |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 3473 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1644 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2900 mm |