2004 BMW 645 vs. 2000 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2004 BMW 645 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Pagani Zonda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Pagani Zonda would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Pagani Zonda (389 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2004 BMW 645. (322 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 645. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 645 weights approximately 465 kg more than 2000 Pagani Zonda.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Pagani Zonda (569 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW 645. (447 Nm). This means 2000 Pagani Zonda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW 645.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 645 | 2000 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | BMW | Pagani |
Model | 645 | Zonda |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 5987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 389 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 569 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1151 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2730 mm |