2004 BMW 745 vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 2004 BMW 745 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 4,390 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 BMW 745 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 745 weights approximately 790 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 745 | 1952 Riley RM A | |
Make | BMW | Riley |
Model | 745 | RM A |
Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 4390 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2025 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2870 mm |