2004 BMW 745 vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2004 BMW 745 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2004 BMW 745. (322 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 745. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 745 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1962 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 BMW 745 | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 745 | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4390 cc | 6964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2025 kg | 1875 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 40 L |
