2004 BMW 745 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2004 BMW 745 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 BMW 745 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 745 (310 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 243 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 745 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 745 weights approximately 1211 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 BMW 745 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW 745. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 BMW 745 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | 745 | 102 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 310 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1985 kg | 774 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2160 mm |